RCT compares three teaching strategies for pelvic exam training in medical students
A randomized controlled trial enrolled 138 medical students during clerkship to compare three distinct instructional approaches for pelvic examination training, all incorporating a commercially available pelvic simulator. Students were assigned to either: reading a handout, watching a video of a pelvic exam on a model, or watching a testimonial video of a patient's experience. The groups were compared against each other, with outcomes including skill performance, measures of fear/anxiety/comfort, and overall satisfaction.
Analysis showed a statistically significant time × group interaction for discomfort on the Fear of Pelvic Examination Scale (F-PEXS) (P = 0.038). In a real-life assessment environment, the model video group had higher total F-PEXS scores (P = 0.034) and higher F-PEXS discomfort scores (P = 0.009) compared to the reading group. Conversely, for skill performance, the testimonial video group achieved higher pelvic examination checklist scores than the reading group (P = 0.034). Effect sizes and absolute score numbers were not reported.
Safety and tolerability data were not reported. Key limitations include the lack of reported effect sizes, absolute measures of change, and clinical significance of the score differences. The primary outcome was not explicitly defined, and follow-up duration was not reported. The findings contribute to discussions on brief, targeted educational strategies for teaching pelvic exams, but the unclear magnitude of differences and unreported clinical relevance warrant cautious interpretation for practice.