Clinic workflow, not outreach method, linked to genetic testing rates in high-risk patients
This cohort study evaluated genetic testing participation among high-risk patients (personal or family history of breast or ovarian cancer) at eight Providence Health and Services clinics in California. The outreach evaluation (n=7,112) used a randomized component to compare three methods: mailed brochure, email, and SMS text message. The workflow evaluation (n=16,965) used a retrospective component to compare testing offered in the same building versus requiring patients to go to a different building.
For outreach, the overall genetic testing order rate was less than 3%, and this low rate did not differ significantly between the three outreach methods. For workflow, the genetic testing order rate was 28% lower in the different building workflow compared to the same building workflow (IRR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.65–0.80). The analysis also found that differences in testing rates by patient characteristics were larger in the different building workflow.
Safety and tolerability data were not reported. A key limitation is that the workflow analysis was retrospective and observational, which limits causal inference. The outreach results come from a randomized comparison, but the overall participation was very low regardless of method.
In practice, these findings suggest that low-cost outreach methods like email are feasible but may have limited impact when participation is very low. The results point to point-of-care access in the same building as potentially critical for improving participation and equity in genetic testing for high-risk patients. However, the retrospective nature of the workflow analysis means the association should be interpreted cautiously.