Meta-analysis finds balance training improves balance in COPD patients receiving pulmonary rehabilitation
This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials involving 548 COPD patients aged 50 years or older. The scope was to evaluate the effect of adding balance training to pulmonary rehabilitation compared to pulmonary rehabilitation alone on balance and functional outcomes.
The authors synthesized findings showing significant improvements with added balance training. For static balance, the mean difference was 3.29 seconds (95% CI: 2.76 to 3.82). For dynamic balance, the mean difference was -2.08 seconds (95% CI: 2.48 to -1.69). Overall balance improved with a mean difference of 3.09 score (95% CI: 1.11 to 5.06). Balance confidence improved with a mean difference of 6.48 score (95% CI: 2.48 to 10.48). Health-related quality of life improved with a standardized mean difference of -0.78 (95% CI: 1.45 to -0.11). Functional exercise capacity showed no significant difference.
Key limitations noted by the authors include only seven trials being included, a population limited to COPD patients aged 50 years or older, and follow-up duration not reported. The certainty of evidence was not explicitly reported, though the meta-analysis used the Cochrane RoB-2 tool for risk of bias assessment.
Practice relevance is that balance training is a clinically relevant component to add to pulmonary rehabilitation for COPD patients due to the high prevalence of balance impairments. However, findings indicate association from pooled trial data, not direct causation.