Systematic review and meta-analysis of pharmacist-led care in COPD
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated pharmacist-led interventions in COPD patients, pooling data from 2313 participants across included trials. The authors synthesized evidence on exacerbation-related hospital admissions, medication adherence, smoking cessation rates, health-related quality of life, COPD Assessment Test scores, and lung function.
The analysis reported a lower risk of exacerbation-related hospital admissions with pharmacist-led care (RR = 0.43; 95% CI: 0.33-0.55). Improvements were observed in medication adherence and smoking cessation rates, and health-related quality of life was reported to improve. In contrast, COPD Assessment Test scores and lung function showed non-significant effects.
The authors noted several limitations: substantial heterogeneity, variable overall study quality, many small trials, and a high risk of bias in many trials. They highlighted inconsistent effects across outcomes and concluded that the evidence is heterogeneous and limited by study quality.
In terms of practice relevance, the authors suggested that pharmacist-led interventions in COPD may improve selected medication-related and patient-centered outcomes. However, they emphasized that robust conclusions regarding clinical effectiveness and effects on COPD Assessment Test scores and objective disease measures cannot be drawn, and findings should be interpreted cautiously.