Non-powered stapler linked to fewer postoperative air leaks than powered stapler in severe emphysema LVRS
A single-center, single-blinded randomized controlled trial compared two surgical staplers in 19 patients (32 procedures) with severe lung emphysema undergoing lung volume reduction surgery. The intervention was the non-powered AEON Endostapler, and the comparator was the Echelon Flex Powered Plus Stapler. The primary outcome was the duration of postoperative air leak.
For the incidence of immediate postoperative air leaks, the non-powered stapler was associated with air leaks in 6 of 17 procedures (35.3%), compared to 9 of 15 procedures (60%) with the powered stapler. The median time to air leak closure was 14.3 hours for the non-powered stapler versus 93.2 hours for the powered stapler. The hazard ratio for faster air leak closure with the non-powered stapler was 1.6, but this was not statistically significant (95% CI, 0.73-3.3; P = .25).
Safety and tolerability data were not reported. Key limitations include the small sample size, single-center design, and the non-significant statistical result for the primary time-to-event analysis. Both stapler systems were found to be feasible for use in this population. The findings suggest a potential signal favoring the non-powered device for reducing air leaks, but the evidence is of low certainty and cannot support definitive superiority claims.