Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Compares Enteral Nutrition and Medications in Pediatric Crohn's Disease
This systematic review and network meta-analysis synthesized data from 1,182 patients with pediatric Crohn's disease to compare enteral nutrition strategies against immunomodulators and corticosteroids. The authors evaluated clinical remission induction, mucosal healing, and maintenance outcomes across various nutritional and pharmacological interventions within the pediatric population.
Regarding induction, exclusive enteral nutrition was significantly superior to corticosteroids for clinical remission with an odds ratio of 1.72 (95% CI 1.18–2.52). For mucosal healing, exclusive enteral nutrition demonstrated marked superiority versus corticosteroids with an odds ratio of 7.55 (95% CI 3.59-15.88). SUCRA rankings placed CDED plus PEN at 0.80 and exclusive enteral nutrition at 0.78 for remission induction, while corticosteroids ranked lowest at 0.31.
Safety data indicated serious adverse events ranged from 0%–3.1% for enteral nutrition therapies compared to 15.1% for corticosteroids and 11.8% for azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine. Notably, these safety profiles differ between nutritional and pharmacological approaches. For maintenance, azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine was superior to placebo with an odds ratio of 12.50 (95% CI 2.47–63.14).
The authors note that these findings support enteral nutrition as first-line induction therapy in pediatric Crohn's disease. However, the review does not report follow-up duration or absolute numbers for all outcomes. Clinicians should interpret these pooled estimates within the context of available evidence and individual patient factors carefully.