This narrative review examines monoclonal antibodies and Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide inhibitors used for migraine. The study looks at these drugs after they have been on the market. Data on these treatments is currently scarce. The review points out that experience before marketing approval was limited. Additional risks exist because these are biologic compounds. Chronic use of most of these drugs also presents unknown long-term issues. The authors note that active pharmacovigilance aims to fill gaps using continuous processes. These processes help identify adverse events that may have been missed earlier. Readers should understand that more information is needed before these drugs are fully understood. The main reason to be careful is the lack of complete safety data. This review does not provide specific medical advice or recommend these treatments. It serves to highlight the need for ongoing monitoring and research.
Post-marketing review highlights safety gaps for migraine CGRP drugs
Photo by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases / Unsplash
What this means for you:
Limited data on long-term risks for migraine CGRP inhibitors requires active monitoring and caution. More on Migraine
Asia-Pacific experts reach consensus on migraine management and anti-CGRP mAb use in adolescents Asia-Pacific experts find consensus on migraine diagnosis and treatment
Frontiers · May 28, 2026
Narrative review discusses antibody targeting of the TNF–TNFR2 axis in cancer with noted limitations Antibodies targeting TNFR2 show promise for cancer treatment
Frontiers · May 18, 2026
Narrative review refutes causal link between endometriosis and migraine Endometriosis and Migraine Share Hidden Genetic Roots
Frontiers · May 15, 2026
Meta-analysis of Chinese decoctions for migraine shows varied efficacy rankings across three botanical interventions. New analysis ranks best herbal treatments for migraine pain
Frontiers · May 1, 2026