Meta-analysis shows ERAS care improves recovery and reduces complications in laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cancer
A meta-analysis of randomized controlled and quasi-experimental studies assessed the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols compared to traditional perioperative care. The analysis included 2,361 patients undergoing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cancer. Data were pooled to evaluate various secondary outcomes, including time to first anal exhaust, feeding, urination, defecation, out-of-bed activity, catheter and drainage tube removal, and overall length of hospital stay. Patient satisfaction and the overall incidence of postoperative total complications were also examined.
The pooled results indicate that postoperative recovery times and hospital stay were significantly earlier and shorter in the ERAS group compared to the traditional care group. Additionally, the overall incidence of postoperative total complications was lower, and patient satisfaction was higher in the ERAS group. Specific absolute numbers, effect sizes, and p-values were not reported in the source data provided.
Safety and tolerability data, including adverse events or discontinuations, were not reported for the interventions. A key limitation identified is the potential heterogeneity among the included studies. Due to this heterogeneity and the nature of the meta-analysis, the magnitude of the effects and generalizability beyond the specific included studies remain uncertain. Further validation by higher-quality research is recommended before broad implementation.